Survey, study,poll + 0

This my 4th installment exposing reality vs. a survey (study, poll). A Duke study of 6 - 12 yr. old children proved that 1) institutional child rearing in earliest years has a corrosive effect on early brain and behavioral development. 2) the sooner children are placed with families, the better their chances for recovery 3) within institutions, the more they resemble families, the better children function. Three Doctors bent upon proving that orphanages are undesirable, conclude that “what children need is loving care in which they feel valued, appreciated and protected.” Is this not just what a proper orphanage attempts to do? It points to the agenda of the persons responsible for the survey and the doctors extrapolating from the evidence. Only liberals think in contradictions. They are as transparent as Obama’s lies in his state of the union address last night. These three liberal doctors (and Obama’s progressives) want “high quality family care’ not ‘outdated interventions.’ What pray tell do you call their support of early childhood intervention programs, cradle to grave child care initiatives, pre-school and Head Start programs because families are too busy to or insufficient in the education their children? When you study the obvious is it a study? Children preferably should be raised in families. Yet, in today’s society, the family (mother and father married for life) has virtually disappeared. An orphan by definition is a child bereft of one or both parents abandoned to the state or to a charitable home. By extrapolation, most of America’s children are already ‘orphans,’ not in need of state care but of a caring orphanage. It take as little genius to face these facts as to realize that our President lives in an alternative, irrational and delusional world - the world of contradictory words, ideas and agendas. Remember the outcome of a study depends upon the input of an agenda.