Monday, March 09, 2009

rOMMEL AND ME

If not me, who? Who will tell it like it is? Liberals have elected a black man who’s not black. Democrats have elected a socialist who denies he’s a socialist but won’t self-identify as ‘anything.’ Deluded citizens elected a profiteer, not an ascetic. Erwin Rommel the German panzer leader during World War II, when confounded with the fact that he was making an "astounding" amount of money from his book, "Infantry in the Attack," said that he didn’t "know what to with all the cash that’s flooding in. I can’t possibly use it all, I’m happy enough with what I’ve got already. And I don’t like the idea of making money out of writing up how other good men lost their lives." No problem for Obama, whose writings ( ghosted or his) partially propelled him into the White House where within 6 weeks of his ascension to power, millions of Americans have virtually lost their lives, by losing almost ½ of their life savings. Obama not only is not concerned about this catastrotphe, but he also thinks a time of loss is a "time to buy." Then there’s the matter of hedonism, about which Rommel would know little, unlike our new President. In North Africa, in World War II, Rommel learned that General Staff officers took up residences which were luxurious quarters, at which "they swiftly evolved a suave and civilized routine, which required iced lemonade through the heat of the day..." Well, Rommel soon packed the lot off to accommodations of the "ordinary soldier." Like those spoiled on ice, Obama spoils himself with heat in the Oval Office and with an elitist lifestyle at the taxpayers’ expense. You say it’s O.K. because he’s President? Fortunately, only approximately 27% of Americans elected him. If he is nothing but an elitist, why am I, a nobody from nowhere not equally qualified to be president as a nothing but his opposite? My cabinet would come from a phone book not from the ranks of liberal Clinton leftovers and young, creeping socialists who aspire to perpetuate their ties to big government at the expense of the public’s chains.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home