Not 'blind indifference'

If not me, who? Who will tell it like it is? Your President or your candidate for President? Contrary to what Richard Dawkins the atheist espouses, the universe did not come into being, does not sustain itself and will not continue to exist because of "blind, pitiless indifference." Neither our new President nor his vehement opponents express ‘blind, pitiless indifference’ to the world around them. Cause and effect are in play, playing opposing games. Conservatism vs. liberal, creeping socialism. Will only the fittest and most adaptable survive or does some other-worldly force guide each philosophy toward its ultimate goals? Is the goal merely the here and now or the beyond? Dawkins and his atheist friends, offer us no hope or change. Everything is temporal. Obama also offers hope for Utopian change in the present without concern for the future. Conservatives, realists all, offer hope and change for better lives here on earth and beyond. Amidst the ‘blind, pitiless indifference’ that nature often seems to display, we conservatives hold the truths of the inalienable rights to ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ endowed by nature and nature’s God. We cover both bases of human existence - the temporal and the eternal - so to speak, and thus are better prepared for dual success.