Child abuse- In Obamalogic ‘Fairness’ calls for gambling subsidies

Child abuse- In Obamalogic ‘Fairness’ calls for gambling subsidies. 1. Is it not child abuse if government doesn’t provide a subsidy for gambling to prevent parents from taking food from the mouths of their children so they can gamble at government sponsored casinos? If government provides food, medical. Heat ing, cooling and myriad other subsidies to the ‘poor’, why not a gambling subsidy Seems perfectly logical to me in this ‘Obamera’ of total contradiction. All states but Hawaii and Utah now have legalized gambling. Money from gaming goes to the states and Washington so why not re-cycle it back into the pockets of the gamblers to subsidize meals and more gambling? 2. Is it not child abuse to punish students at a PA high school for clogging up toilets with toilet paper and forcing them to publically ask for their wipes quota? Some lawyers have undoubtedly already agreed in this ‘Obamera’ of total litigation.