NO ACCIDENTS
WHY IS THERE NO SUCH THING AS AN ACCIDENT? I WONDER. BAD THINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN TO GOOD PEOPLE, TO INNOCENT PEOPLE, TO ANY POOR SCHMUCK. GUILT MUST BE ATTRIBUTED TO SOME ONE OR ENTITY THAT IN TURN MUST PAY WITH MONEY OR LIFE. ONLY THE MILITARY IN WARTIME ALLOWS FOR MISTAKES. SELF-RIGHTEOUS (AND TYPICALLY GREEDY) LAWYERS FILL THE ACCIDENTAL VOID WITH ALLEGED CRIMES.
IF FATE OR PROVIDENCE EXISTED, A 90 YR. OLD MAN COULD HAVE ACCIDENTALLY PLOWED HIS CAR INTO A CROWD AND NOT COMMITTED MURDER. I GRANT THAT 90 YR. OLD INCOMPETENT DRIVERS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED BEHIND THE WHEEL, THAT PERHAPS SOCIETY COMMITTED A CRIME. NEVERTHELESS, THE OLD CODGER IS RELEGATED TO THE STATUS OF MURDERER BY LAWYERS WHO STEP IN TO PUNISH SOMEONE. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ACCIDENT. BLAME MUST BE ASSIGNED.
AT A CLUB, A FIRE CAUSED BY PYROTECHNICS COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT EITHER. A TOUR MANAGER HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPRISONED SINCE 2002 FOR THIS CRIME AND THE CO-OWNER OF THE NIGHTCLUB IS NOW ON TRIAL FOR DOUBLE COUNTS OF MURDER FOR EACH OF THE VICTIMS OF THE INFERNO. SELF-RIGHTEOUS (AND TYPICALLY GREEDY) LAWYERS AGAIN HAVE MOOCHED OFF OF PUBLIC SYMPATHY PARLAYING IT INTO PUNISHMENT, PUBLICITY AND PROFIT. THERE IS SUCH THING AS AN ACCIDENT. MURDEROUS INTENT MUST BE FOUND.
IF A NATIONAL NEWS AGENCY CAN WASTE TIME AND MONEY ON A 10 SECOND MUSIC CLIP TO INTRODUCE KATIE COURIC'S CBS NEWS SHOW, HOW LIKELY IS IT THAT OUR NATION CARES ABOUT THE INJUSTICE OF AMERICA'S GUILT TRIP? MEANINGLESS WORDS ARE USED TO DESCRIBE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS MUSICAL INTRODUCTION: "FLEXIBLE YET MEMORABLE, SERIOUS AND URGENT YET LIGHT." OUR CRIMINAL SYSTEM OFTEN METES OUT PUNISHMENTS THAT ARE FLEXIBLE YET MEMORABLE, SERIOUS AND URGENT YET LIGHT, EXCEPT IN SPURIOUS CASES THAT PERVERT AN ACCIDENT INTO A CRIME.
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. KNEW HOW TO COIN AN APPEALING AND SIMPLISTIC SOUND BITE. HE SAID, "INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS INJUSTICE EVERYWHERE." DR. KING, HOWEVER, HAD NO FORESIGHT WHEN HE REFERENCED RACISM. IF WE DEFINE LAWYERS AS A RACE OF PERVERTS WHO DENY ANY CITIZEN HIS OR HER RIGHT TO AN ACCIDENT, WE MUST ADMIT THAT THEY PRACTICE THEIR REVERSE RACISM AS "AN EXCESSIVE AND IRRATIONAL BELIEF IN OR ADVOCACY OF THE SUPERIORITY OF A GIVEN GROUP, PEOPLE, OR NATION( THEMSELVES) ON RACIAL GROUNDS ALONE." SELF-RIGHTEOUS AND GREEDY FOR FAME AND/OR FORTUNE, THEY HAVE REPLACED ACCIDENTS WITH EVIL INTENTIONS. IS THIS GOOD?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home